White Ex-Dallas Police Officer Convicted of Killing Unarmed Black Man Released from Prison After 7 Years

NBCNews.com:

Amber Guyger, the former Dallas police officer who fatally shot an unarmed neighbor after mistakenly entering his apartment in 2018, was released from a Texas prison on parole Friday. Guyger, 38, served seven years of the 10-year sentence handed down in October 2019 for the murder of Botham Jean, 26. 

 

She left the Christina Melton Crain Unit in Gatesville on Friday. She will spend the rest of her sentence in the community, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice said. Jean’s loved ones were unhappy with Guyger’s early release but their greater sorrow stemmed from the 10-year sentence, family attorney Lee Merritt said Friday. 

 

“We were opposed to her early release because we wanted her to at least do a maximum amount of time, the full 100%,” he said. “But we realized that that was not always something that we were not guaranteed so it’s frustrating. But for the family, the frustration came at the point where she was sentenced to (just) 10 years, not just the release today.”

Suprised that this story hasn't gotten more traction or "outrage" in the black, liberal media space. As this some real racist shit what with the punishment certainly failing to meet the crime. After all, the kind of racist psychosis that allows a white female police officer to shoot and kill an unarmed Black man in his own home, simply because she mistakenly believes she has entered her own apartment, is unnerving, chilling and goes back centuries. Yet, in 2026 the black liberal crowd only seem to sound off on racism when it fits a narrative or when it suits their ego, political agende or pockets. To think, Botham Jean was eating ice cream in the safety of his Dallas home when Guyger took his life, yet she received a mere 10-year prison sentence and was released on parole after serving only seven years. Indeed, her early release not only deepens the pain of a family that has already lost everything, but when a Black man's life can be taken in his own home and the consequences seem so limited, it sends a devastating message about whose lives this system and the groupthink that loves to pretend that they give a f-ck, truly values.

RELATED: Former Dallas cop Amber Guyger guilty of murder and conviction sends powerful message

Lying, Woke NYT, 1619 Project Scribe Nikole Hannah-Jones Sent Daughter as ‘Sacrifice’ to Dangerous Public School

NYPost.com:

An atrocious city public school where controversial New York Times scribe Nikole Hannah-Jones sent her daughter as a “sacrifice’’ was so dangerous it was known as “Little Riker’s Island,’’ according to parents. 

 

Ridiculously lagging PS 307 in Brooklyn was rife with severe academic challenges that were only exacerbated by rampant safety concerns involving bullying and teacher assaults, charged a change.org petition in 2023. 

 

“The school’s safety has deteriorated to a point where PS307 is known as ‘Little Riker’s Island,’ ’’ said the furious online petition demanding the resignations of the then-principal and her assistant principal — while referring to the city jail so notoriously dangerous that it is being closed down.

This woman continues to be a real piece of work, putting activism over her own kid's education and well-being by enrolling her in an under-performing NYC public school in hopes of challenging their unequal education system. Indeed, Nikole Hannah-Jones’s experience with NYC schools should've prompted criticisms of teacher unions and the city’s education negligent bureaucracy, but instead she remains focused on racial ideology. Good thing her daughter spoke out because parents who are really concerned about poor schools, inadequate homework, or chaotic classrooms would normally be motivated by their responsibility to secure the best education for their children, rather than woke activism that only hinders their ability to learn and be productive members of society.

RELATED: The Tragedy of Nikole Hannah-Jones

Holdout Juror in Lindsay Clancy Case Says He Didn’t Doubt Her Guilt

People.com:

The holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy case, which ended in a mistrial this month, has retained an attorney who described the man as “an American hero,” a “champion of justice” and a supporter of President Donald Trump. Edward Paltzik announced in a statement Thursday, Sept. 17, that he was representing the man, who publicly identified himself to NewsNation as Michael P. Desronvil. 

 

Desronvil, 48, is a resident of Plymouth County, Mass. Paltzik said in his statement that Desronvil is “presently safe and sound at an undisclosed secure location in a rural area of Northern New England.” “This American Hero and Champion of Justice loves the United States of America as the greatest country in the world; cherishes our sacred Constitution as the pinnacle of human liberty; and supports our amazing leader, President Donald J. Trump, as a fellow defender of common-sense, liberty, and sanity,” the statement also said. 

 

Paltzik pledged to hold accountable “to the maximum extent of the law and beyond” what he described as “the evil people who have so viciously attacked” his client. “In the meantime, though, he has persevered and remains utterly unbroken thanks to his devout Catholic Faith,” the statement continued. “As a devoted father and man of God, he will not be defeated or shattered by the wicked who wish harm upon him.”

This guy is a national hero and should be treated as such going forward. In fact, Trump should invite him to come to his next State of the Union address and he should give him a Presidential Medal of Honor down the line. Even more so, people need to rally around this man (esp. after attempts by the msm to smear him) and make sure he lives a safe and prosperous life, because standing your ground and sticking to your morals as a black man in a room full of woke, angry, white, liberals hellbent on letting a woman who planned and murdered her 3 kids get off scot-free? Well, it doesn't get much tougher than that.

RELATED: Do the Women Excusing Murder Because of 'Hormones' Know What They Are Saying?

Rep. Jasmine Crockett Lambasted by Progressives for Appearing Onstage With Chris Brown

Mediaite.com:

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) is facing backlash from fellow progressives after taking the stage at a Chris Brown concert in Texas to honor the singer, with critics pointing to his sordid history of violence towards women. 

 

The Democrat appeared alongside Brown at AT&T Stadium in Arlington on Saturday, where she suggested that his career and impact, along with that of tourmate Usher, would be formally recognized. 

 

“We are here because of Chris Brown!” Crockett shouted as Brown stood beside her and the crowd erupted. “We are experiencing Black joy at the highest level. And I wanted to make sure we document that at the congressional level. So let’s give it up again for Chris Brown,” she added, embracing the singer before leaving the stage. Texas state Rep. Venton Jones (D) also joined Crockett onstage and presented Brown with a state resolution honoring his achievements in music and entertainment.

Funny how this works. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, the renowned and latest Black Liberal Queen, who only has 4 months left in Congress and has accomplished nothing during her 4 years in the House outside of serving as the ratchet, black, face of the TDS movement, is receiving backlash from progressives for appearing onstage with Chris Brown?!? If only it was all so simple. Because I'm skeptical enough to believe that either Crockett doesn't give a f or she's playing the long game and catering to all the plethora of Black criminals she'll be helping out once she's out of Congress and back as a public defender in Texas. 

RELATED: Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s praise of Chris Brown hit a nerve

Florida Governor DeSantis Offers 'Asylum' To Black Holdout Lindsay Clancy Juror After Media Starts Doxxing Him

AOL.com:

Florida's governor threw his support behind the lone juror who blocked an acquittal for a mother who admitted killing her three children. 

 

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis on Friday offered "asylum" to the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy case after NBC10 Boston published a report detailing the man's alleged past domestic violence, the New York Post reported. DeSantis accused the outlet of trying to destroy the reputation of a juror whose identity remains protected. (RELATED: Judge Declares Mistrial In Lindsay Clancy Case After Lone Juror Refuses To Budge) 

 

"A man objected to allowing a woman to kill her three young kids and get away with it, so NBC is trying to smear that juror, whose identity should be protected. Another low for legacy media," DeSantis wrote on X. He added, "If the juror is being harassed, Florida will provide asylum — I'm sure he'd be welcomed and appreciated."

Further proof that Affluent White Female Liberals are the worst group of people in mankind today. Going so far as to punish and dox a black man for having the audacity to believe that Lindsay Clancy should be held responsible for murdering her kids one by one is crazy work, but totally expected when it comes to AWFLs. Of course, how it's even legal to dox an anonymous juror is another story and thanks in part to Gayle King, we know that there's a huge race angle here, but damn if this isn't the epitome of Malcolm's X's famous quote on 'white liberals as being more deceitful and dangerous than conservatives,' comparing them to a "fox" rather than a "wolf".

RELATED: Lindsay Clancy Jury Narrative Buster

Lindsay Clancy Defense Lawyer Suggests a Single Juror is Standing in the Way of a Not Guilty Verdict

Mediaite.com:

Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney Kevin Reddington appeared to suggest on Thursday that a single juror is in the way of a not guilty verdict for Lindsay Clancy. 

 

Reddington addressed the court after Judge William Sullivan called jurors back into the courtroom to reiterate the definition of reasonable doubt. 

 

Reddington said:

The court has an instruction from the foreperson of that jury that’s been working for a week now saying that there’s one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you’ve given him or her on reasonable doubt, and I suggest, respectfully, that the soft instruction that you gave them, saying at the sidebar, can you listen to the law as I instruct you, does not focus on the issue. It is the question is not sufficient enough. 

 

It does not allow any foundation for a motion to remove the juror who refuses to accept your instructions on the law, on reasonable doubt. And if we come back here in a half an hour with a mistrial, because of a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it’s a shame. It’s a real shame. And that’s why I object to the court’s ruling. I request that we have further inquiry. I request that — my motion is to remove this juror that refuses to listen to your instruction on reasonable doubt.

Clancy has been on trial for five weeks to determine if she can be held criminally responsible for killing her three children, Cora, Dawson, and Callan in January 2023. Clancy, who experienced postpartum depression and psychosis, has pleaded not guilty, and her attorney has argued she cannot be held responsible for strangling the children to death due to insanity. 

 

Clancy currently faces five potential outcomes: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, not guilty by reason of insanity, and not guilty.

If what Clancy's lawyer is stating is true then may God give that juror the willpower to hold the forth. Because Lindsay Clancy is a monster and a serial murderer who methodically strangled and killed her children one by one. And the day we allow post-partum depression, etc. to be an excuse to murder your kids is a wreckoning that I can't even begin to comprehend.

RELATED: Nancy Mace Says Race Fuels 'Pink Mob' Support for Lindsay Clancy

Sean Grayson, Ex-Cop Convicted of Killing Sonya Massey, Dies 6 Months Into His Sentence

NYPost.com:

Sean Grayson, the ex-Illinois sheriff’s deputy who was sentenced to two decades in prison for killing single mom Sonya Massey after she called 911 for help, has died, according to his attorney. 

 

His defense attorney, Daniel Fultz, confirmed to The Post that Grayson, 32, died early Sunday. The former deputy had been diagnosed with colon cancer before the 2024 shooting, and in January, his attorney noted that his cancer had advanced to his liver and lungs. 

 

A three-member Illinois Prisoner Review Board voted unanimously in July to deny Grayson’s application for an early medical release. Fultz was unable to comment on whether Grayson’s death was related to his cancer diagnosis. He was six months into his 20-year second-degree murder sentence for fatally shooting Massey in her Springfield, Illinois, home on July 6, 2024 after she called 911 about a possible prowler.

Karma is so beautiful to watch sometimes. RIP Sonya Massey.

RELATED: Sean Grayson’s History of Misconduct

Convicted Killer Karmelo Anthony Gets New Judge, Demands a New Trial

CNN.com:

The attorney for a Texas teenager convicted of fatally stabbing a track athlete during a high school meet told a judge Thursday that Karmelo Anthony deserves a new trial because of errors that limited access to the proceedings. 

 

Anthony’s attorney told a newly appointed judge that prosecutors also did not follow through with an off-the-record agreement. Defense attorney Russell Wilson said the case’s original judge allowed a “shadow docket” that kept information out of the trial. “Everything was done off the record, at an astonishing clip,” said Wilson, who didn’t represent Anthony at the criminal trial. 

 

Anthony already won a legal victory on Wednesday when the judge who presided over his trial was removed from the case. Judge Michael Chitty was then assigned to consider the motion from Anthony’s attorneys asking for a retrial in the killing of Austin Metcalf.

But just as Black liberals everywhere certainly began to celebrate their favorite convicted killer getting a new judge and the possibly a new trial, comes this bombshell: little Karmelo was already kind of a bad dude before he killed his schoolmate Austin Metcalf. Indeed, according to prosecutor Bill Wirskye, Anthony’s girlfriend, Valeria, told school officials on the morning of April 2, 2025, that she had broken up with Anthony and that he was stalking her. About an hour later, Austin Metcalf was fatally stabbed. Wirskye also alleged that Anthony had a history of violence, fantasized in texts about stabbing someone, and had previously been placed in a Louisiana program for children with behavioral and fighting issues. Well, that's not good and it could explain Karmelo's thought process that fateful day.

RELATED: James Talarico Weighs in on Karmelo Anthony’s Conviction

White OF Model Courtney Clenney Sentenced to Just 6 Years for Stabbing Black Boyfriend to Death

NYDailyNews.com:

OnlyFans model Courtney Clenney has copped to manslaughter in the 2022 stabbing death of her boyfriend and could be out of prison within two years, according to details of her recent plea deal. 

 

Clenney, 30, was about to be tried for second-degree murder with a deadly weapon for killing boyfriend Christian Obumseli during a fight, and a conviction could have landed her in prison for life. She reached a plea deal on July 31. 

 

Clenney’s manslaughter sentence is for six years, including time served, and she has already been imprisoned for four, TMZ reported Monday. Her remaining sentence could shrink to a year and change due to other factors, the outlet noted.

Surely the lack of outrage over this case from the usual professional race-naiters on the Left is due to the karma that comes with dating outside your race as Obumseli did here for years Nonetheless, this verdict is just flat-out wrong as Clenney plead guilty to manslaughter in a plea deal and showed zero remorse during the Miami-Dade Circuit Court hearing with video capturing her laughing, sticking out her tongue, and blowing kisses to someone in the courtroom after entering her plea. Now she's expected to be released from jail in less than two years due to time served and potential good behavior credits. Also, shortly before pleading guilty, Clenney also reached a settlement in a civil lawsuit filed by Obumseli's family--so soon she'll be totally off the hook for nurdering her ex-boyfried. Now once she gets out of prison, would anyone be surprised if she went to her OnlyFans 'career'? Taking in tons of money from forlorn men around the world and resurrecting her life being the evil wench that she is.

RELATED: OnlyFans is Only Destroying Women

Jason Arday, University of Cambridge Professor at Center of Plagiarism Scandal Resigns

BBC.com:

Prof Jason Arday said he had "concluded that the only way to bring this chapter to an end is to step away". Earlier, the university said it had launched an investigation "following new information" about Arday's "academic qualifications and honorary appointments". 

 

It comes after another academic - self-defined "race realist" Nathan Cofnas, who was sacked from his Cambridge role in 2024 - said he found numerous instances of plagiarism in Arday's work and questioned some of his stated achievements. The academic has admitted errors in his work, but has insisted he is not "a liar". In a statement posted by the Good Law Project on Wednesday, Arday said that being appointed professor had been "without question, the greatest professional privilege of my life". 

 

"The years since my appointment have also been marked by an unrelenting level of public scrutiny and personal attack," he said, adding "there comes a point when the personal cost becomes too great".

Of course, because he's black, a lot of white liberals were quick to come out in defense of Arday after allegations of him being a serial plagiarist first surfaced. In fact, the usual loons on the Left became so 'outraged' at Arday's critics that the Met/police investigated UK reporter Jack Grove for 4 months just for researching his articles. And now we come to find out that Arday wasn't just lying about his writings, but career and charity work as well. Indeed, a man who became white liberal's wet dream by checking off all the boxes when it comes to diversity, inclusinn and equity in academia, turns out to be a major fraud...how ironic.

RELATED: Jason Arday Resigns From Cambridge

Witness: Karmelo Anthony ‘Provoked’ Austin Metcalf Before Fatal Stabbing

NYPost.com:

A witness shot down Karmelo Anthony’s self-defense claim in bombshell testimony Saturday, claiming the accused killer provoked Austin Metcalf before their deadly encounter. Anthony apparently antagonized Metcalf during the fatal April 2025 confrontation at David Kuykendall Stadium, the 17-year-old student told the Collin County, Texas courtroom. 

 

The Frisco Memorial High School student, who went to school with Metcalf, saw the stabbing from nearby bleachers, he said when questioned by a prosecutor. 

 

Despite Anthony’s claim that he whipped out a weapon to protect himself while being ambushed by Metcalf and his brother Hunter, the witness said he didn’t see anyone crowding around the alleged murderer.

Not looking too good for this kid as more evidence comes out that he's an angry, low-life thug and not the 'innocent child' who was only trying to defend himself. Plus who brings a kitchen knife to a track meet anyway, especially after it comes out that Metcalf repeatedly asked Anthony to leave the area and said that he wouldn't fight Karmelo before he was stabbed to death.

RELATED: Karmelo Anthony Trial to Proceed with No Black Jurors

Suspect in New York City Subway Shove Death was Released from Psych Hold Hours Before

ABC7NY.com:

The man charged with murder in the fatal shoving of a 76-year-old man at a Chelsea subway station was released from psychiatric hold mere hours earlier, police say. 

 

Police say their suspect, 32-year-old Rhamell Burke, came up behind the victim, 76-year-old Ross Falzone, and pushed him down the 18th Street station stairs just after 9:30 p.m. on Thursday. 

 

Officers found Falzone unconscious and unresponsive. Officials say he suffered a traumatic brain injury, a fractured spine and a fractured rib and was pronounced dead at Bellevue Hospital just before 3 a.m. on Friday. Police say the shoving appeared to be unprovoked, and the death is being investigated as a homicide.

Unbelieveable. But the death of 76-year-old retired teacher Ross Falzone is yet another grim example of what happens when soft-on-crime policies, ideological naïveté, and misplaced “suicidal empathy” are allowed to override basic public safety. Indeed, the man accused of killing Falzone, repeat offender Rhamell Burke, already had a long history of arrests involving assault and other crimes, yet he continued cycling through a system more concerned with protecting criminals than protecting innocent people. Even more disturbing, a black woman Burke allegedly attacked weeks earlier admitted she declined to cooperate with prosecutors because she “didn’t want to put another black man in jail”: a tragic illustration of how racial guilt and activist-driven thinking can cloud moral judgment. Within weeks, Burke allegedly escalated from subway harassment to lethal violence, pushing an elderly man to his death only hours after being released from psychiatric evaluation. it's cases like this that fuel growing frustration with progressive criminal justice policies that repeatedly prioritize offenders, excuses, and social theories over law, order, and the safety of ordinary people.

RELATED: Everything Wrong With Criminal Justice Is Wrapped Up in This One Case

New York Times Sued for Discriminating Against White Man Passed Over for Promotion

APNews.com:

A federal civil rights agency filed a discrimination lawsuit Tuesday against the New York Times, claiming that the news organization passed over a white male employee for a promotion in favor of a lesser qualified woman to meet its diversity goals. The New York Times called the lawsuit politically motivated and said it would defend itself “vigorously.” 

 

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed the lawsuit Tuesday on behalf of a New York Times editor who lodged a complaint after he didn’t get the role of deputy real estate editor in 2025, alleging gender and racial discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex, race, national origin or religion. 

 

The EEOC claimed the news organization’s publicly stated goals of increasing the number of women and people of color in its leadership ranks influenced the decision to exclude the white male applicant for a final round of interviews, while advancing three women and a Black man.

Of course, there’s tremendous irony here considering that DEI policies have often been criticized for disproportionately benefiting white women. Either way, while white men still largely dominate corporate promotions and board seats, it’s often white men (like this guy) lower on the corporate ladder who end up feeling the greatest impact. That said, the most practical solution would obviously be a performance-based meritocracy, though whether corporations will ever fully embrace that approach remains to be seen.

RELATED: More on the EEOC Lawsuit Against the NY Times

Supreme Court Strikes Down Louisiana's Majority-Black District as Racial GerryMander

APNews.com:

The Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down Louisiana’s second majority Black congressional district in a decision that could open the door for Republican-led states to eliminate Black and Latino electoral districts that tend to favor Democrats and affect the balance of power in Congress. 

 

In a 6-3 ruling, the court’s conservative majority found that the district, represented by Democrat Cleo Fields, relied too heavily on race. Chief Justice John Roberts had described the district as a “snake” that stretches more than 200 miles (320 kilometers) to link parts of the Shreveport, Alexandria, Lafayette and Baton Rouge areas. 

 

The Rev. Al Sharpton, president of the National Action Network, called the decision a “bullet in the heart of the voting rights movement.”

Liberal media outlets, Democrats and the usual professional race-baiters (like Al Sharpton) on the Left will argue that this ruling by SCOTUS 'weakens' the Voters Rights Act, but what it actually does is make it more strict. Indeed, Justice Alito’s interpretation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act raises the standard for justifying race-based redistricting. Alito argues that such measures are only constitutional if they directly remedy intentional discrimination, not simply to enhance minority representation. To the Left's severe disappointment, this shifts the burden onto proponents to prove minorities lacked meaningful participation in prior redistricting—something increasingly difficult given modern political realities. With significant minority representation now common in state legislatures, Alito contends that the original need for race-based remedies has largely faded. As a result, Section 2 remains valid, but is limited to rare, extreme cases. His reasoning parallels the Court’s approach to affirmative action, emphasizing that eliminating racial discrimination requires ending race-based decision-making altogether.

RELATED: ‘Kind of Ruling I Like’: Trump Praises Supreme Court Voiding Majority-Black District In South

Jesse Jackson Jr. Rebukes Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and Joe Biden for Not Truly Knowing His Father During Memorial Service

FOXNews.com:

During his father’s memorial service on Saturday, Jesse Jackson Jr. offered a sharp rebuke of the tributes given by former Democratic presidents Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, noting that the trio shared one thing in common: they didn’t really know his father. 

 

"Yesterday I listened for several hours of three United States presidents who do not know Jesse Jackson," Jackson Jr. said on Saturday. 

 

The reverend’s son called out the idea that his father’s life wasn’t defined by the "political order," but by a commitment to those who were marginalized. "He maintained a tense relationship with the political order, not because the presidents were White or Black, but the demands of our message, the demands of speaking for the least of these — those who are disinherited, the damned, the dispossessed, the disrespected — demanded not Democratic or Republican solutions, but demanded a consistent, prophetic voice that at no point in time sold us out as a people," Jackson Jr. continued.

Of course, no one exploits tragedies better than Democrats, so no surpise here that Biden, Obama and Clinton would take turns and use Jesse Jackson's funeral service to attach Trump. The irony here, of course, is that Trump knew Rev. Jackson better than any of them, helped Jackson out a lot back in the day and genuinely seeemd to like the guy. There's also that time, back in 2008, when Jackson lashed out at Obama for not speaking to issues important to black people and while Jackson would later apologize to Obama for the remarks, after his passing, the irony of Jackson's often strained relationship with establishment Democrats isn't lost today.

RELATED: 3 presidents, and thousands of everyday people, celebrate the life and legacy of Jesse Jackson

Maryland Official Releases Man with No Bail Who Returns One Hour Later to Assault Same Woman

FOXNews.com:

A Maryland man who was released from jail with no bail requirement after allegedly beating up a woman went back to the victim's home and assaulted her again, according to officials.

James Bowman III, 40, was arrested Nov. 7 in Waldorf, Maryland, for domestic-related assault after he allegedly punched a woman in the face and bit her hand, according to the Charles County Sheriff's Office.

A district court commissioner released Bowman from the Charles County Detention Center on his own recognizance following his arrest, meaning he didn't have to post bail.

Bowman III, 40, was arrested on November 7 for allegedly biting and punching a woman during a domestic violence incident. Somehow, he was released six hours later without bail on the condition that he not harm her again. Yet, less than an hour after his release, Bowman returned to the location and allegedly attacked the same woman while she was holding a toddler. Police say he struck the child in the forehead and beat the woman senseless and then was subsequently charged with assault and child abuse and is now being held without bail. Unbelievable. Yet, funny too that despite claims from most liberals and BLM activists that Black men are disproportionately imprisoned due to racial bias, there are also so many cases in which offenders are repeatedly released or not held accountable for multiple prior crimes, suggesting a pattern of lenient treatment rather than racial targeting. But no one wants to talk about that.

RELATED: Federal Executive Order Seeks to Target Cashless Bail

Texas A&M Adopts Policy Requiring Professors To Get Ok From School President to Discuss Certain Race and Gender Issues

TexasTribune.org:

Texas A&M University System regents unanimously voted Thursday to approve a new policy that will require each campus president to sign off on any course that could be seen as advocating for “race and gender ideology or topics related to sexual orientation or gender identity.” 

 

The policy defines race ideology as “attempts to shame a particular race or ethnicity” or anything that “promotes activism on issues related to race or ethnicity rather than academic instruction. Gender ideology is defined as “a concept of self-assessed gender identity replacing, and disconnected from, the biological category of sex.” 

 

Regents also approved a policy that will prohibit faculty from teaching material inconsistent with the approved syllabus for each course. Both policies go into effect immediately, but enforcement will begin in spring 2026.

While the professional race-baiters and white liberals will be "outraged" at this news, this policy is actually in line with the rest of the state. Then too is the fact that the Left has no one to blame but themselves for these new college rules. After all, race and gender are subjects that have been talked about in American academia for decades now, uninterrupted with little to no resistance from the gov't or activist groups. But then the Woke Era came and screwed everything up for everybody.

RELATED: University Professors Explain the Problems with the Woke, Elitist Democratic Party

Sean Grayson Found Guilty of Murder in the Death of Sonya Massey

NBCNews.com: 

Sean Grayson, a former Illinois sheriff’s deputy, was convicted Wednesday of second-degree murder in the 2024 death of Sonya Massey, a Black mother of two who had called 911 about a possible prowler.

Grayson was charged with first-degree murder, but jury instructions included the option to convict him of the lesser charge of second-degree murder. Jurors deliberated for almost 12 hours after closing arguments ended late Tuesday morning. Grayson’s family cried and held hands as the verdict was read. Outside the courthouse, protesters celebrated the guilty verdict and chanted, "I rebuke you in the name of Jesus."

Attorneys Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci, who represented her family in a $10 million civil settlement, said that they believe Grayson’s actions warranted a first-degree murder conviction but that it was "still a measure of justice for Sonya Massey."

A partial victory if you ask me as Grayson should've been found guilty on 1st degree murder, not 2nd. Massey was never a threat to that cop's life. Dumb ass just didn't know what 'rebuke' meant, the word triggered him and as he promised he'd do beforehand, he shot her to death in the face on her kitchen floor. Then too, with all the trouble Grayson had been in prior to that day, he shouldn't have been a cop, much less in Massey's home to begin with. But that's on the state of Illinois because a corner was cut in the hiring process to fill a spot. Now we wait for Grayson to get sentenced and he better get the max as anything less is an injustice to Sonya Massey's life.

RELATED: Jurors convict Illinois deputy of killing Sonya Massey but can’t agree on first-degree murder charge

Opening Statements Begin in Trial of Former Illinois Deputy Accused of Killing Sonya Massey

NBCNews.com:

Lawyers gave their opening statements to a jury at the Peoria County Courthouse on Wednesday morning, officially kicking off the trial of a former Illinois deputy accused of fatally shooting Sonya Massey.

Sean Grayson, 31, shot Massey, a 36-year-old Black mother of two, in June 2024 after she called authorities to her Springfield home about a possible prowler. The former Sangamon County sheriff’s deputy, who is white, said in a report written after the incident that he feared bodily harm because Massey was holding a pot of boiling water and said, “I rebuke you in the name of Jesus.”

Nearly two weeks later, Grayson was fired and charged with first-degree murder, one count of aggravated battery and one count of official misconduct. He pleaded not guilty and was held in jail pending trial.

First of all, Sean Grayson had no business being in Sonya Massey’s house to begin with. He had a history of trouble in law enforcement, having been disciplined for misconduct on the job and bouncing between multiple positions in just a few years-—a major red flag if there ever was one. He also didn’t have his body camera on during the incident (another erd flag) and we only got to see a video of the incidnet because his partner's badge cam was on. Plus, when he told Massey to turn off the stove where water was boiling, she had already shown signs of mental illness, something a trained police officer should be aware of. I’m also convinced that Grayson didn’t even understand what the word “rebuke” meant, and instead took it as a threat. That misunderstanding seemed to trigger him, leading to his outburst—yelling that he’d “shoot her in the face” if she didn’t put the pot down. At that point, Massey was as good as gone. What’s worse, after shooting her, Grayson showed a shocking indifference to life when his partner tried to render aid and he told him not to bother because she was “dead anyway.” Bottom line: Sean Grayson murdered Sonya Massey, the facts are all on video. He deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison, and the city of Springfield should also be held accountable for hiring Grayson in the first place.

RELATED: What to know about the murder trial of an Illinois sheriff deputy who killed Sonya Massey

Inside the Congressional Black Caucus’s Deep Ties to AIPAC

TheNation.com:

More than a year has passed since the International Court of Justice, the United Nations’ highest judicial body, issued its first order in the landmark case brought against Israel by South Africa, which contends that Israel has been committing acts of genocide in its war in Gaza. The ICJ found that “with respect to the right of the Palestinians in Gaza to be protected from acts of genocide…and the right of South Africa to seek Israel’s compliance,” South Africa’s case was “plausible.” Plausible: a restrained word that, in this context, fails to convey the harsh truth of the war Israel has been conducting. Palestinians are being starved, displaced, and slaughtered. More than 60,000 Palestinians have died, and 1.9 million are being brutally displaced, in a manner eerily similar to the dispossession of their forebears in the Nakba of 1948. By the end of September, according to a group of international food-aid organizations, more than 600,000 Palestinians would be experiencing famine, a completely preventable calamity marked by extreme food deprivation, acute malnutrition, and starvation-related deaths.

Since the International Court’s ruling, a growing number of genocide scholars and human-rights advocates have concluded that the genocide in Gaza is not merely plausible but actual. In early September, an overwhelming majority (86 percent) of the voting members in the International Association of Genocide Scholars voted to endorse a declaration that “Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide in Article II of the United Nations Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).” The UN’s own Commission of Inquiry reached the same conclusion a few weeks later. Rabbis and Israeli human-rights groups—B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights—have testified that their own nation has betrayed the solemn pledge “Never again.” Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and other groups have witnessed the appalling deaths, displacement, and famine in Gaza and issued the same indictment: Israel is committing acts of genocide.

Yet to this day, the Congressional Black Caucus—the long-standing corps of lawmakers dedicated to safeguarding civil rights (and known as “the conscience of Congress”)—has not issued a formal declaration condemning Israel; it hasn’t even produced a statement calling for a ceasefire. The CBC’s silence isn’t accidental: More than half of its current 61 members have been endorsed or funded by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the powerful US lobbying arm for Israel’s agenda. In the 2023–24 election cycle alone, AIPAC endorsed 26 of the caucus’s members, raising $4.6 million for them and another $3.5 million for Black Democratic candidates.

No surprise here, the CBC has long been suspect, given its unwavering loyalty to the Democratic establishment. For years, it’s operated hand-in-hand with institutions like the NAACP, which notably opposed holding a Democratic primary after Joe Biden dropped out of the race last year. The CBC also bankrolls the usual lineup of professional race-baiters (figures like Bakari Sellers and Keith Boykin, etc.) who regularly appear on outlets such as MSNBC and CNN, while race-baiting, spouting Democrat talking points and propping up career, do-nothing politicians like James Clyburn. So really, why wouldn’t a group of soulless, corrupt Black politicians also align themselves with Zionist interests? For them, it’s always been about the money, something the late, great Assata Shakur warned us about long ago.

RELATED: Democrats Pull Away From AIPAC, Reflecting a Broader Shift