Diddy Friend Deon Cole Roasts Nicki Minaj for Becoming a Trump Supporter

Yahoo.com:

Here’s what made eleven seconds of televangelist energy into a news cycle. Cole didn’t pull those references from nowhere. 

 

Nicki has spoken publicly about getting butt injections in the past, including in a 2022 conversation on The Joe Budden Podcast that was widely covered at the time. And “hasn’t been herself.” That line has been writing itself for weeks. 

 

On January 28, 2026, Minaj appeared at the Trump Accounts Summit in Washington and called herself the president’s “No. 1 fan,” telling the room that she wasn’t going to change. She pledged between $150,000 and $300,000 toward Trump Accounts, a new investment account program tied to Trump’s 2025 tax law.

Of course, if you work in uber-liberal Hollywood like Deon Cole (a mid-tier comedian) does, you almost have to be anti-Trump or olderwise it''l cost you future jobs, gigs and perhaps even your whole entire livelihood. But Hollyweird extremism aside, several factosr are also at play here. For starters, there's the sheer stupidity of people continuing to care what celebrities (who are often clueless when it comes to politics) think about everyday issues--this latest brouhaha coming two years after Democrats and Kamala Harris losing an election partly because they put way too much stock (and $$$) into celebrity endorsements. Then there's an entire undustry ganging up on Nicki and dragging her through the mud for supporting Trump?!? You know the same group of hypocrites with nothing but a shitload of decadence and debauchery in their backyards. But leave it Cole (an old pal of Diddy), the corrupt NAACP and the rest of the merry band of celebrity liberals to get up on their high horse and roast a Black (the same group they always claim to protect) for daring to be different.

RELATED: Why Nicki Minaj Appearance at TPUSA AmericaFest Matters

Inside the Congressional Black Caucus’s Deep Ties to AIPAC

TheNation.com:

More than a year has passed since the International Court of Justice, the United Nations’ highest judicial body, issued its first order in the landmark case brought against Israel by South Africa, which contends that Israel has been committing acts of genocide in its war in Gaza. The ICJ found that “with respect to the right of the Palestinians in Gaza to be protected from acts of genocide…and the right of South Africa to seek Israel’s compliance,” South Africa’s case was “plausible.” Plausible: a restrained word that, in this context, fails to convey the harsh truth of the war Israel has been conducting. Palestinians are being starved, displaced, and slaughtered. More than 60,000 Palestinians have died, and 1.9 million are being brutally displaced, in a manner eerily similar to the dispossession of their forebears in the Nakba of 1948. By the end of September, according to a group of international food-aid organizations, more than 600,000 Palestinians would be experiencing famine, a completely preventable calamity marked by extreme food deprivation, acute malnutrition, and starvation-related deaths.

Since the International Court’s ruling, a growing number of genocide scholars and human-rights advocates have concluded that the genocide in Gaza is not merely plausible but actual. In early September, an overwhelming majority (86 percent) of the voting members in the International Association of Genocide Scholars voted to endorse a declaration that “Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide in Article II of the United Nations Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).” The UN’s own Commission of Inquiry reached the same conclusion a few weeks later. Rabbis and Israeli human-rights groups—B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights—have testified that their own nation has betrayed the solemn pledge “Never again.” Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and other groups have witnessed the appalling deaths, displacement, and famine in Gaza and issued the same indictment: Israel is committing acts of genocide.

Yet to this day, the Congressional Black Caucus—the long-standing corps of lawmakers dedicated to safeguarding civil rights (and known as “the conscience of Congress”)—has not issued a formal declaration condemning Israel; it hasn’t even produced a statement calling for a ceasefire. The CBC’s silence isn’t accidental: More than half of its current 61 members have been endorsed or funded by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the powerful US lobbying arm for Israel’s agenda. In the 2023–24 election cycle alone, AIPAC endorsed 26 of the caucus’s members, raising $4.6 million for them and another $3.5 million for Black Democratic candidates.

No surprise here, the CBC has long been suspect, given its unwavering loyalty to the Democratic establishment. For years, it’s operated hand-in-hand with institutions like the NAACP, which notably opposed holding a Democratic primary after Joe Biden dropped out of the race last year. The CBC also bankrolls the usual lineup of professional race-baiters (figures like Bakari Sellers and Keith Boykin, etc.) who regularly appear on outlets such as MSNBC and CNN, while race-baiting, spouting Democrat talking points and propping up career, do-nothing politicians like James Clyburn. So really, why wouldn’t a group of soulless, corrupt Black politicians also align themselves with Zionist interests? For them, it’s always been about the money, something the late, great Assata Shakur warned us about long ago.

RELATED: Democrats Pull Away From AIPAC, Reflecting a Broader Shift