Don Lemon Says Megyn Kelly Looks 'Trans'

Yahoo.com:

Don Lemon has landed in hot water once again after making harsh comments about Megyn Kelly’s looks during his new podcast. The former CNN anchor, who often speaks out in support of the LGBTQ community, shocked many by saying Kelly “looks trans” and “chopped.”

The clip quickly went viral, and even his longtime fans are struggling to defend him, calling the remarks cruel, hypocritical, and beneath someone who claims to stand for inclusivity. The backlash began after Lemon made offensive comments while discussing “MAGA women” on “Clip Farmers.”

When one of his co-hosts asked if Kelly was “chopped,” a slang for ugly, Lemon replied, “I think she looks trans.” The 59-year-old went on to say that the journalist “looks clockable,” a term often used to suggest someone could be identified as transgender.

To be fair, going back to his famous brouhaha with rapper Talib Kweli some years back Don Lemon has always been a prick. After all, Lemon is a guy who always whines and complains about the evil's of white men--yet he's "married" to one. Lemon is also the same guy who used to 'scream at' female colleagues while he was at CNN. Back in 2023, while still at CNN, he was accused of ageism for saying Nikki Haley ss 'past her prime'. Lemon also didn't bother to check in on Chris Cuomo after his 'friend' and colleague was canned by CNN during COVID. And Lemon was recently called out by Piers Morgan for being a hypocrite and a 'complete dick' due to Lemon's smug attitude, elitism and entitlement during their interview on Morgan's show. Lemon is also the same guy who refuses to call himself a liberal even though 99% of the time he takes the side of the Left on political and socioeconomic issues. And I'm saying all this as someone who doesn't even like Megyn Kelly that much.

RELATED: Don Lemon tells Black, Brown citizens to carry guns in case ICE shows up

Stephen Miller’s Wife Explicitly Threatens Cenk Uygur’s Citizenship in Shocking On-Air Meltdown

Yahoo.com: 

Katie Miller, wife of senior Trump aide Stephen Miller, explicitly threatened Cenk Uygur’s citizenship Wednesday as the pair threw down in a shouting match on Piers Morgan Uncensored – warning the progressive pundit that he “better check” his application is clean. Miller, who formerly worked in the White House, threatened to walk off the show at one point during a debate over New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani.

When Miller protested Uygur was defending Mamdani by bringing the debate back “to the Jews and the anti-Israel movement,” he said she was “lying.” Miller, in turn, accused Uygur of pushing “racist, bigoted rhetoric” against her.

During the mud-slinging bout, however, while Uygur was shouting her down, Miller let out a striking remark. “You better check your citizenship application that everything was legal and correct,” she said. “Because you’ll be just be like Ilhan Omar coming next.”

Yeah, threatening to deport someone because you don't like something they said in a debate is a new level of crazy. Still, looking at Stephen Miller's wife on screen for the first time, I couldn't help but wonder how old she was because yunno the brain doesn't fully develop until you're 25. Well, she's 34, so no excuse there. And you just know that the Left are going to have a field day with this one (as they should). That said, if I was Stephen Miller I'd probably suggest to my wife to not do any more panel debates anymore.

RELATED: Top Trump Officials Are Moving Onto Military Bases

Australian Reporter Calls Out Kamala Harris for ‘World-Class’ Dodge on Question About Joe Biden

Mediaite.com:

Things got a bit awkward when Sarah Ferguson, a TV reporter for Australia’s ABC TV, called ex-Vice President Kamala Harris out for a “world-class pivot” away from a question about former President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline during a Wednesday interview. “Wasn’t [Biden’s] refusal to recognize his own frailties the reason that you faced a nearly impossible task?” Ferguson asked about Harris’s doomed 2024 presidential bid. 

 

Harris took the opportunity to bash President Donald Trump and avoided talking about Biden. “Donald Trump ran on a platform that was, in large part, I believe, misrepresenting his intentions to the American people,” Harris said. 

 

She said a “fair amount” of MAGA voters were lied to by Trump on inflation and other issues. Harris then said Trump’s “misrepresentation of intention” and “massive amounts of mis-and-disinformation” contributed to her loss, before Ferguson jumped in to point out she avoided the question. “Forgive me… I want to interrupt you, because that is a world-class pivot,” Ferguson said. “But it is not the question that I asked you, which is about Joe Biden’s failure to recognize his own frailties and what that did to you. The question is about Joe Biden. Are you still reluctant to criticize the former president?”

Always great to see Democrats pols outside the cushy confines of an MSNBC or CNN or the like, where they know that 9 times out of 10 they'll be peppered with nothing but softball questions that they can answer in their sleep. Props to Sarah Ferguson for doing some real journalism.

RELATED: Obama unleashed ‘WTF’ rage at Pelosi for breaking ‘pact’ and endorsing Kamala Harris, new book claims

Sean Grayson Found Guilty of Murder in the Death of Sonya Massey

NBCNews.com: 

Sean Grayson, a former Illinois sheriff’s deputy, was convicted Wednesday of second-degree murder in the 2024 death of Sonya Massey, a Black mother of two who had called 911 about a possible prowler.

Grayson was charged with first-degree murder, but jury instructions included the option to convict him of the lesser charge of second-degree murder. Jurors deliberated for almost 12 hours after closing arguments ended late Tuesday morning. Grayson’s family cried and held hands as the verdict was read. Outside the courthouse, protesters celebrated the guilty verdict and chanted, "I rebuke you in the name of Jesus."

Attorneys Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci, who represented her family in a $10 million civil settlement, said that they believe Grayson’s actions warranted a first-degree murder conviction but that it was "still a measure of justice for Sonya Massey."

A partial victory if you ask me as Grayson should've been found guilty on 1st degree murder, not 2nd. Massey was never a threat to that cop's life. Dumb ass just didn't know what 'rebuke' meant, the word triggered him and as he promised he'd do beforehand, he shot her to death in the face on her kitchen floor. Then too, with all the trouble Grayson had been in prior to that day, he shouldn't have been a cop, much less in Massey's home to begin with. But that's on the state of Illinois because a corner was cut in the hiring process to fill a spot. Now we wait for Grayson to get sentenced and he better get the max as anything less is an injustice to Sonya Massey's life.

RELATED: Jurors convict Illinois deputy of killing Sonya Massey but can’t agree on first-degree murder charge

Trump Adminostration Sued Over Food Stamp Freeze

CBSNews.com:

A coalition of officials from half of the states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration on Tuesday over the suspension of food stamp benefits amid the ongoing government shutdown, as millions of Americans brace for a disruption in federal food aid in the coming days.

The states, which include California, New York and Pennsylvania, are asking a federal judge in Massachusetts to order the Department of Agriculture to provide benefits through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for November, including by tapping into a contingency fund to ensure the assistance continues to flow to more than 25 million people living within their borders.

They argue that the administration's decision to cut off food stamp payments, which are provided to roughly 42 million people nationwide, is unlawful and threatens to deprive millions of Americans of essential food benefits that help protect against food insecurity and hunger.

Of course, both sides are to blame for this food stamp situation. What with Democrats openly admitting that they're using this shutdown for 'leverage', while Republicans could end the shutdown by doing what Democrat Senator John Fetterman recently suggested: 'nuke' the filibuster to end it. Nonetheless, I'm guessing that the Democrat states using will be be able to find some judge out there to side with the,, putting the GOP in a very awkward spot if they try to appeal.

RELATED: Tapper: 'This is Also a Choice by Senate Democrats Not to Open the Government'

Democrats Stand by 88-Year-Old Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton in 'Early Stages of Dementia'

NBCNews.com:

Eleanor Holmes Norton — the 88-year-old nonvoting delegate for Washington, D.C., in the House of Representatives — is facing calls from a prominent Democratic strategist to make 2026 her last full year in Congress. 

 

Former Democratic National Committee interim chair Donna Brazile, who was Norton’s campaign manager when she was first elected in 1990 and her chief of staff for eight years, wrote in an opinion piece in The Washington Post on Monday that she should not seek re-election during the midterms. 

 

Brazile, 65, called Norton her “dear friend for 44 years,” her “role model and mentor” and “a second mother.” “But Norton, a Democrat, is now 88 — the oldest current House member. She is no longer the dynamo she once was, at a time when D.C. needs the kind of energetic representation in Congress she provided for decades,” Brazile wrote.

This feels like a repeat of what Democrats did recently with 90-year-old Senator Dianne Feinstein: keeping an aging establishment figure in office simply because she was a guaranteed vote who kept corporate donors satisfied. And we all saw how that ended. Now, with Norton clearly showing signs of dementia, it’s the same story again: her handlers refusing to let her step down, and Democrats still failing to recognize their growing age problem.

RELATED: Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton scammed at home by group claiming to be cleaning crew

MSNBC Host Freezes Karine Jean-Pierre with Brutal Question: ‘Have You Apologized to Robert Hur?’ Amid Biden Cognitive Concerns

Mediaite.com:

Former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was left scrambling for an answer when MSNBC anchor Elise Jordan pressed her on the “mental acuity” of her old boss, ex-President Joe Biden. 

 

Jordan, during MSNBC’s The Weekend: Primetime on Saturday night, asked Jean-Pierre if she regretted going after Special Counsel Robert Hur, after his 2024 report called into question Biden’s cognitive ability and memory. 

 

Biden’s mental decline, Jordan said, was obvious to Americans who watched his debate with President Donald Trump in June 2024 — so why would Jean-Pierre, at the time, call Hur’s report “gratuitous” and one that did not “live in reality,” Jordan wanted to know.

You just know Karine Jean-Pierre was caught totally off guard by that question. But then all liberal guests are when MSNBC dares to do actual journalism, instead of their usual caping for Democrats that has become the standard of the network. Bottom line, this book tour isn't going well at all for KJP. And there's a few reasons why: the recent Jake Tapper book exposing Biden's lack of mental acuity while he was President, what people saw with their own eyes (yunno, stuff like Biden rarely speaking off-the-cuff, using cue cards and scripted questions at his rare press conferences and of course, his poor and infamous debate performance against Trump last year). Yet KJP, in need of book sales (and frankly speaking a job) still wants you to believe that despite spending time with Biden every day for 4 years...saw nothing. And even MSNBC isn't buying her BS.

RELATED: The Reviews Are Already Rolling In for KJP's 'Independent,' And ...

San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie Proves That Donald Trump Can Work with Democrats

TheGuardian.com:

Donald Trump rarely has kind words for Democrats, especially those who stand in his way. But on Thursday the president offered something unfamiliar: a compliment. 

 

As federal agents mobilized at a US Coast Guard base in the Bay Area, Trump credited San Francisco’s new mayor, Daniel Lurie, for “very nicely” persuading him to stand down from a planned immigration enforcement “surge” in the city this weekend. 

 

“I spoke to Mayor Lurie last night and he asked, very nicely, that I give him a chance to see if he can turn it around,” Trump wrote, without hurling an epithet or nickname. “I told him, ‘It’s an easier process if we do it, faster, stronger, and safer but, let’s see how you do?’”

Of course Donald Trump can work with Democrats, after all, he used to be one. Like any president, though, Trump must prioritize his party’s interests first. Still, with 47, his ego also plays a major role, yet and that could actually work in Democrats’ favor. Imagine someone like Ro Khanna approaching Trump about paid leave, an issue supported by roughly 80% of Americans across party lines. You don’t think Trump would listen, especially with the midterms approaching? Sure, he’d want to take credit for it and would need his ego stroked, but Khanna might actually push a bill through if he tried hard enough. And since paid leave is so popular, Republicans would look bad rejecting it, making it a potential win for Democrats.

RELATED: Why Trump spared San Francisco

Stephen A. Smith Bends the Knee and Apologizes to Jasmine Crockett for Criticizing Her

FOXNews.com:

Radio host Stephen A. Smith posted a video Wednesday offering an apology to Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, after he previously called out her performative politics. 

 

Ahead of his show, Smith released a video titled "An apology to Jasmine Crockett" that addressed his past attacks on the Texas representative's fiery behavior. 

 

The cultural commentator said his comments had "been misconstrued and misinterpreted" by critics, but he felt compelled to defend Crockett after seeing "disturbing" comments about her from President Donald Trump.

Bottom line: SAS got the call. That’s what happened after he dared to offer constructive criticism (without insults or name-calling) toward the vile, race-baiting creature that is Jasmine Crockett. Indeed, the backlash from the Democrat shills and Black elites within the woke mob towards Smith was immediate, brash, and deeply personal. And, like a good little puppet, Smith folded. You see, Jasmine Crockett isn’t a typical politician that one can fairly critique or call out on her policies (or lack thereof(. She’s the angry face of the Democratic Party and beyond reproach, no matter how foolishly she consistently behaves on TV. So, the woke mob put SAS in his place, and oh so conveniently, the very next day, Smith shifted left and began attacking Trump. Good boy!

RELATED: Patel rips Stephen A. Smith for suggesting NBA arrests were Trump revenge

Amazon Plans to Replace More Than Half a Million Jobs With Robots

Fox56News.com:

Amazon is hoping robots can help it avoid hiring more than half a million U.S. workers, according to The New York Times.

The e-commerce giant’s automation team projects that the company won’t have to hire over 160,000 U.S. workers it would otherwise need by 2027, the Times reported, citing interviews and internal strategy documents. The shift would reportedly save Amazon roughly 30 cents on every item it picks, packs and delivers.

By 2033, automation could eliminate the need for more than 600,000 additional hires, even as the company expects to sell twice as many products, the Times said. The leaked documents reportedly show Amazon’s robotics team aims to automate 75% of the company’s operations, and the online retailer has already begun preparing PR strategies to manage potential backlash.

This plan exposes the dark side of automation. As while efficiency and profits soar, human livelihoods face extinction. As the shift threatens not only warehouse jobs, but also the economic stability of countless families, proving that corporate convenience often comes with a devastating social cost.

RELATED: Introducing Blue Jay and Project Eluna, Amazon’s latest robotics and AI technology for its operations